Re: [xsd-users] no abstract base classes with "Customizing the generated type — the complex case"

Oliver Schneider mail at oli-obk.de
Wed Jul 30 05:43:49 EDT 2014


Ah, nevermind, i just saw what happened.

you removed the implementation of _clone from the abstract class, (the
declaration is still there though, but that's fine, it'd be a linker error)

all _base classes inheriting from an abstract class must also not have a
_clone function.
Am 30.07.2014 11:39, schrieb Oliver Schneider:
> Hi Boris,
>
> the _base classes still have a _clone function (declared and defined)
> What are the criteria that make sure they don't exist? maybe i need to
> change something in my setup?
>
> /Oliver
>
> Am 30.07.2014 11:24, schrieb Boris Kolpackov:
>> Hi Oliver,
>>
>> Oliver Schneider <xsd-users at oli-obk.de> writes:
>>
>>> I'd prefer the binary (Windows), if it's not too much hazzle.
>> Here you go:
>>
>> http://codesynthesis.com/~boris/tmp/xsd/xsd-4.1.0.a1-i686-windows.zip
>>
>> Let me know if there are any issues.
>>
>> Boris
>>



More information about the xsd-users mailing list