[xsd-users] xsd 1.5.0 released

[Boris Kolpackov]

James,

James Boyden <jboyden at geosci.usyd.edu.au> writes:

> Since xsd must know which elements/attributes are invalid (since it is
> performing the checks), would it be possible for xsd to provide more
> verbose, descriptive errors which specify the invalid elements/attributes
> by name?

At the moment xsd uses Xerces-C++ to perform schema validation.
So most diagnostics messages come from Xerces, not xsd. I agree
that this particular message is not very descriptive. I will check
if I can replace it with something more meaningful. Unfortunately,
I don't think I will be able to show which elements/attributes caused
the error. Unless we implement our own diagnostics, that is ;-).


hth,
-boris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 652 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://codesynthesis.com/pipermail/xsd-users/attachments/20051031/12de4ae4/attachment.pgp