[studxml-users] Asserts in next_expect functions

[Boris Kolpackov]

Ramisés Martins da Silva <ramises.silva at kryptus.com> writes:

> I'm curious about the "next_expect functions that also set the content". In
> it's implementation it is asserted that the event must be a start_element.
> My question is if the placement of this assert inside the function is
> important. For me it seems more natural that a blocking condition like an
> invalid parameter test comes first in the function.

Yes, I agree, and am not sure why we did it this way. Fixed for the
next release, thanks!

Boris