[odb-users] is it possible to use same relationship table for 2 class data members ?

[Lidia Kalinovsky]

Hello Boris.

We definitely will try to use custom mapping odb functionality.
If you could recommend some known payment free solution for map
implementation
that works well as std::map and has directs "values" function ( get vector
of values without iterating ), it will be great.

Thanks a lot for quick response and great library.

Lidia.



On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Boris Kolpackov <boris at codesynthesis.com>wrote:

> Hi Lidia,
>
> Lidia Kalinovsky <lidia at lemur-soft.com> writes:
>
> >  #pragma db table("A_bs")
> >  std::unordered_map<unsigned long, std::shared_ptr<B> ,
> std::hash<unsigned long>> m_bsMap;
> >
> >  std::vector<std::shared_ptr<B> > m_bs;
> >
> > ( i see solution with defining one member as transient and using db
> > callback functions to update/load it ).
>
> Yes, this is probably the most straightforward way.
>
> If you have many objects with such containers (or containers of
> this template), then it may be better to create your own container
> wrapper that maintains the two underlying containers. You can then
> add a custom mapping for such a container for ODB. Let me know if
> you are interested in this approach and I can provide more details.
>
> Boris
>



-- 
Software integration and outsourcing services,
Lemur-Soft, Giv'at Nili
Israel, 37825
Phone : (+972) 545748325
Fax : (+972) 775345383
Email : lidia at lemur-soft.com
Web: www.lemur-soft.com