[odb-users] Handling pimpl idiom in ODB

[Boris Kolpackov]

Hi Uwe,

cetoni GmbH - Uwe Kindler <uwe.kindler at cetoni.de> writes:

> You proposed the concept of virtual data members. Is the concept of   
> virtual data members already implemented in the 1.6.0 release or is
> it planned for future releases?

It is still planned for one of the future releases. My impression was
that you preferred the composite value type approach[1]. Have you had
a chance to try it and if so were there any problems?

[1] http://codesynthesis.com/pipermail/odb-users/2011-August/000250.html

Boris