[xsd-users] Poll: anonymous types without --morph-anonymous

[Gerard Lanois]

Hi -

I'm in the situation you describe (C++/Tree, using anonymous types, but
not specifying --morph-anonymous) for certain projects.

I would be affected by this change, but I am willing to either fix my
.xsd or fix my
application code.


-Gerard

On 5/10/07, Boris Kolpackov <boris at codesynthesis.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are considering dropping support for anonymous types in the
> generated code for the C++/Tree mapping. The reason being
> significant complexity in the code generator. The plan is to
> turn the --morph-anonymous option on by default. This will result
> in all anonymous types automatically becoming named (with names
> derived from corresponding elements/attributes).
>
> What I would like to find out is if there is anybody who is
> compiling schemas with anonymous types and is not using the
> --morph-anonymous option.
>
>
> thanks,
> -boris
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQGVAwUBRkMVBMiAKQuuCE8dAQLc7gv/cSwBGdAizM8oUtLs8MkDf+jYJoccZLSS
> SJtsmaUzg8XxRRLlHZ89ZeNfktC/nfHGTq0Mym2DW/c4UQsGglk3fmuKXOZWDlt0
> QKP1BC4jRBORvZfSNUaLmhLmKaer4Gr+JWOHLN0n+JqGbq+NoCvf2x4n9CI4UHei
> QzMWZEB6SaCJRSvioal6nKrDQlSzRtu6OtjebaTOIHlzOsH9oRZXYoBieRUc/+vL
> 9k8VN+OCcExmWKWFvjaRbyAwB0Uzd1RQryTRC5c3bopjJ21PncvO0II85QJNFOfD
> SRr3Cu0Lm2MhDP5mGG57TXI1HUZDDW4m+vD24H5/1d7vZn/zgl+wf9xKGiJ/Dg8y
> 5TF5r/ENaxQMNdGal3WVstApbbVUsLrz7dIQZpn0EzA6n5/6pp3QEqaMD6SY6QVx
> yegIHx1N/MI5DyV2Iz6OUyxLFvNxtkeqIn4ltim4XHY+IappCc83Um5J+66IvpZg
> vjXcOFm+F7+E+P7wHRlOawHjZpPAfHVW
> =tAui
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>